By Agendas: Signe Kivi

Total Agendas: 33

Fully Profiled: 33

2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the government's administrative structure, where responsibilities and programs are scattered across two ministries. Specific political opponents are not personally attacked; rather, the focus is on the procedural issue.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The objection is aimed at the procedural conduct, criticizing the commission's (or the rapporteur's) failure to thoroughly discuss the president's legal objections regarding the ambiguity of the law. The criticism targets the procedure and the substance of the policy; it is not personal.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Basic Education and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (director certification and teacher career model) (653 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker is not expressing direct opposition to the minister or the bill itself, but rather conveying a concern that has been raised by six organizations representing education and local authorities. The criticism is directed at the provisions of the bill concerning the loss of minimum salary status for teachers who lack qualifications. The speaker presents this concern in the form of a question in order to receive clarification from the minister.
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at the Minister of Culture and the ministry’s area of responsibility, who are being criticized for procedural errors. The criticism is intense and focuses on the breach of trust, stemming from the ministry’s failure to withdraw the draft heritage impact assessment document, despite an agreement reached by the Riigikogu committee.
2025-04-21
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the bill's sponsor, who is being criticized for procedural deficiencies and the lack of clarity regarding the sources. The intensity of the criticism is moderate but demanding, emphasizing that anonymous references to scientists are not reliable.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is not enough data.
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

A speaker is criticizing the Center Party faction for not participating in the work of the Environmental Committee, which constitutes procedural criticism due to the absence of their voice. The criticism is directed at a specific political grouping because of their inaction in legislative work.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is not enough data.
2024-11-12
Second reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in connection therewith (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Cadastre Enterprise)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism focuses on the procedure used to prepare the bill, specifically questioning whether the commission considered the experience gained from similar reorganizations in the past. While no direct opposition to the bill is voiced, the necessity of learning from administrative precedents is stressed.
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

While direct opposition is not voiced, criticism is raised concerning the focus and wording of the draft proposal. The criticism points out that the draft fails to address the severity of the problem for men and does not resolve existing terminological shortcomings.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

No direct opposition to the draft bill is voiced, but its procedural expediency is called into question, with an alternative solution being offered. The criticism is aimed at the procedure itself, not at individuals or political factions.
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
2024-10-10
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.

Criticism is directed at the current wording of the draft law, which is considered insufficient to prevent previous tragic situations. The objection is aimed at the substance of the policy and the correctness of the procedure, and is not personal.
2024-10-09
Draft resolution "Establishment of a working group to address the population crisis" (324 OE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.

The Reform Party is identified as the opposition, facing criticism and accusations of insulting the faction's women, mothers, and grandmothers. Criticism is also aimed at the Reform Party's alleged political focus, which, in the opposition's view, concentrates too heavily on distributing public funds. The speaker defends their faction's position, which emphasizes the necessity of family-friendly services.
2024-09-18
First reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Recall of a Member of the National Opera Council who is a Member of the Riigikogu and Appointment of a New Member" (Draft Resolution 494)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

Not enough data.
2024-09-10
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of Section 2 of the Law on Holidays and Commemorative Dates (402 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

Insufficient Information
2024-06-13
Bank of Estonia 2023 Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

There is no direct opposition or criticism; the approach is rather inquisitive and requires accountability regarding the management of the Bank of Estonia's cultural assets.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Language Act and the Public Transport Act (Bill 397 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Kivi indirectly criticizes previous governments and ministries, pointing out that language issues remain unresolved, which has led to similar draft legislation being repeatedly introduced. He/She also criticizes Estonian society as a whole, arguing that it should be more demanding when it comes to language usage. He/She stresses that providing a parallel society (for instance, in education) is a problem that must be avoided.
2024-05-07
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (410 OE) of the Riigikogu titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Find a Solution for the Construction of an Extension to the National Opera Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Direct confrontation is absent, but the opposition concerning heritage and nature conservation restrictions within the bastion belt is addressed. This opposition is presented primarily as problems requiring resolution, necessitating the finding of compromises, with reference made to earlier successful examples (Vabaduse väljak, Kaarli puiestee 8).
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The speaker is not expressing opposition to the minister; rather, they are acknowledging him/her for the challenging task. There is no evidence to suggest criticism or opposition directed at specific opponents or political groups.
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-04-10
First reading of the Draft Resolution (365 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning the resolution titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Eliminate the Russian-Language Versions of the Websites of Ministries and Other Government Agencies."

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no direct confrontation, but the first speaker criticizes the rigid phrasing of the draft bill, which calls for the complete elimination of Russian-language versions. Signe Kivi indirectly points to the necessity of changing the current practice of information duplication by state agencies, which she considers excessive. The criticism is aimed at the policy and procedure, not at individuals.
2024-03-20
Third Reading of the Draft Act (338 SE) on Amendments to the Estonian Cultural Endowment Act and the Gambling Tax Act

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

No direct adversary is named, but disagreements and disputes concerning the inclusion of the new cultural structure (the ERR studio complex) on the list are addressed. The speaker defends the chosen solution, which prevents the infringement of rights belonging to the submitters of projects that were excluded from the approved list. The criticism is aimed primarily at procedural concerns, which are answered by confirmation from the National Audit Office.
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Improving Teachers' Working Conditions" (373 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the potential superfluous content of the draft bill, not directly at the opponents. The speaker asks the presenter to highlight specific issues that can be "pointed out," thereby casting doubt on the proposal's uniqueness.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Increasing the Birth Rate of the Estonian People" (283 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The speaker went on the defensive, refuting criticism voiced in the hall that the Reform Party faction was unconcerned about the declining birth rate. The criticism is aimed at general skepticism regarding the faction's commitment to its stated values.
2024-03-11
Question Regarding the Financing of Cultural Buildings of National Significance (No. 600)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is insufficient data regarding the oppositional stance.
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at challenging the current mandatory school starting age (7 years), rather than criticizing specific individuals. The opposition is policy-based and has been presented primarily as an open question, seeking the minister's opinion.
2024-02-21
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Estonian Cultural Endowment Act and the Gambling Tax Act (338 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There is no direct opposition; no criticism is leveled at any political group. The only thing mentioned is a general historical apprehension regarding the amendment of the Cultural Endowment Act, which is more a matter of political caution than concrete confrontation.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the drafters of the bill, who failed to take into account the proposals of the Ministry of Culture and the concerns of stakeholders. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the creation of inequality and the potential outflow of cultural assets from Estonia. The intensity of the opposition is underscored by the quoted warning regarding the mass deregistration of vintage vehicles from Estonia.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

There is insufficient data regarding the confrontation, as the address was focused on posing a question to the minister and examining the state's contribution.
2024-02-07
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Higher Education Act (291 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

Criticism is directed at the presenter of the draft bill and the speed at which the law amendments are set to take effect, which is considered too rapid for the universities. The opposition is procedural and stems from a demand for historical context, citing the possibility that a draft bill with identical content has been repeatedly argued for in the past.
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient information.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

A direct confrontation with political opponents is avoided; criticism is aimed instead at the provocations that occurred near the monument and the linking of the monument to Russia's war of aggression. The speaker asks whether the time for provocations has passed, referencing the previously tense situation.