By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

The speaker employs an official and neutral tone, focusing on a factual overview of the commission's work. The rhetoric is clearly structured and procedure-centric, utilizing precise dates and the specific wording of decisions. Emotional elements are almost entirely absent, with the exception of a brief reference to war damages in Ukraine.

The speaker employs formal and structured rhetoric, beginning with traditional expressions of courtesy and the presentation of clear thematic statements. The style is argumentative and fact-based, relying on concrete examples such as Russia's war in Ukraine and deaths associated with pseudo-medicine. Emotional appeals are balanced by logical arguments, particularly when justifying the necessity of the security tax and supporting the public health law.

The style is polite and formal, utilizing traditional forms of address ("Respected Speaker of the Riigikogu! Honored Minister!"). The approach is balanced, seeking both positive and negative trends, and the questions are structured and thoughtful.

The speaker employs technically precise and fact-based rhetoric, relying on data and specific details of the legislative bill. The style is formal and professional, yet it also incorporates emotional elements, particularly when addressing the health consequences of alcohol policy. The speaker demonstrates meticulous preparation, referencing exact dates, voting outcomes, and financial figures, and addresses criticism directly and, at times, sharply.

It employs a formal, fact-based, and structured presentation method. It relies primarily on concrete data and numerical arguments, steering clear of emotional appeals. The style is clear and information-rich, focusing on the communication of technical details.