By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

The speaker repeatedly emphasized the consensual decisions within the committee, which points to cooperation and shared agreement. He specifically mentioned that both the inclusion of the draft bill on the agenda and the final vote were consensual, and that the text from the second reading was approved unanimously. He responded to the questions posed by his colleague Aivar Kok in a clarifying and cooperative manner.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation within the coalition, labeling the security tax a "political compromise between the coalition parties" and voicing the Social Democrats' support for the decision. However, they sharply criticize other political forces, especially those who have "contributed to the spread of pseudo-medicine and anti-vaccination sentiment." The approach is pragmatic—acknowledging compromises while maintaining clear ideological positions regarding the future.

The speaker demonstrates a cooperative attitude by politely addressing the minister and seeking dialogue. The style is consultative and focused on gathering information, which suggests constructive collaboration.

The speaker emphasized the consensual nature of the committee work, citing several instances where decisions received unanimous support. He demonstrated openness to cooperation with various ministries and the Culture Committee, taking their proposals into account when amending the draft legislation. At the same time, he acknowledged the necessity of coalition compromises in tax policy, noting that the preferences of his own party might be different.

It emphasizes consensus decision-making in the Finance Committee, where all participating members supported the proposals. It demonstrates openness in answering questions and cooperating with the seven deputies who made the decisions.