By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

The speaker employs a constructive, fact-based approach when posing questions and engaging in debates, concentrating on specific issues such as the security risks associated with nuclear energy and the increase in teachers' salaries. The rhetoric remains measured and analytical, supported by concrete examples and figures, like the allocation of 9 million euros to the teachers' salary fund. The addresses demonstrate a clear willingness to cooperate and a desire to find practical solutions, consistently avoiding an overly emotional or confrontational tone.

It employs a technically accurate and informative style, focusing on specific data and facts. The rhetoric is matter-of-fact and detail-oriented.

Uses a moderate and constructive tone, focusing on specific questions and proposals. The style is professional and fact-based, avoiding excessive emotion.

He/She employs sharp and accusatory rhetoric, criticizing the government’s actions and demanding concrete answers. The style is direct and confrontational, featuring personal attacks and accusations.

It uses constructive and supportive rhetoric, acknowledging the allocation of additional funding for teachers. The style is balanced—it recognizes positive steps but also emphasizes the magnitude of future challenges. It concludes with a call for finding long-term solutions.

Uses a moderate and questioning tone, focusing on the technical issue. The style is professional and fact-based, avoiding political judgments.

He/She employs passionate and compelling rhetoric in defense of the sweetened beverage tax. The speaker cites historical facts and criticizes the lack of consistency among political parties. The style is emotional and highly political, featuring direct accusations.