By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

The speaking style is measured and argumentative, drawing upon both personal convictions and practical experience. The speaker uses the example of the COVID-19 pandemic to illustrate systemic deficiencies, appealing simultaneously to both a sense of justice and pragmatism. The overall tone is constructive and forward-looking, expressing hope for achieving political consensus, and utilizing personal references ("being a young person") to enhance emotional resonance.

Uses strongly emotional and fiery rhetoric, combining personal experiences with political messages. Relies heavily on storytelling (personal visits to Ukraine) and moral arguments. Repeatedly employs a quote from Edmund Burke and emphasizes moral obligations. The style is solemn and evocative, aiming for the emotional engagement of the audience.

They employed systematic and fact-based argumentation, relying on numerical data and international comparisons. They maintained a critical yet constructive tone throughout the entire debate.

The speaking style is polite and formal, utilizing traditional parliamentary addresses ("Austatud," "Lugupeetud"). The questions are specific and goal-oriented, seeking practical answers and measurable results. The style is more analytical than emotional, focusing on facts and concrete actions.