By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

There is no direct confrontation expressed with specific political forces. Instead, it criticizes systemic shortcomings and the slow action taken by previous governments in the area of social guarantees. Regarding Russia, it expresses skepticism about the country's trustworthiness, but does not adopt aggressive rhetoric, focusing instead on practical risk analysis.

Adopts a categorically hostile position towards Russia and personally towards Putin, labeling Russia the "empire of evil" and accusing it of war crimes. It also criticizes "naive politicians" who fail to grasp Russia's true objectives. It completely rules out any compromise with Russia and demands forceful resistance.

The speaker sharply criticized Urmas Reinsalu’s inconsistency regarding tax policy, citing his previous support for the VAT increase back in 2009. The criticism was fact-based and personal, focusing specifically on the shift in his political stance.

The speaker voices criticism of the leaders of Hungary and Slovakia, negatively referencing their "remarks," although acknowledging that these have not always translated into concrete actions. The stance toward Russia is clearly hostile, demanding its withdrawal from Ukrainian territory.