By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik
Total Sessions: 97
Fully Profiled: 97
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is clearly in opposition, criticizing the government (the ruling coalition) for its inaction regarding inflation and prices. The criticism targets both the underlying political logic and the poor attendance of coalition politicians in the chamber during a crucial debate. He/She accuses the government of failing to address a problem that is being felt by hundreds of thousands of people.
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct confrontation; criticism is rather directed at the lack of clarity in the government's plans regarding the merging of public transport centers and optimal financing. The emphasis is on the transparency of the government's actions and accountability for the regional policy consequences.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary conflict is with the government, particularly the Reform Party, which faces accusations of irresponsible fiscal policy and prioritizing the affluent. The criticism is policy-based, specifically citing the government's lack of political will (for instance, regarding the expansion of hospital pharmacies' rights). The confrontation is intense, with critics alleging that the government is handing over 800 million euros to the wealthy while the social sector is left to starve.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and its budget policy, which is sharply criticized for the setting of priorities. The criticism is policy-based, highlighting the government’s decision to favor wealthier societal groups over critical social welfare.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is directed against the stance taken by the minister and the government, which appears to excessively delegate the responsibility for providing school meals to local municipalities. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the lack of national uniformity and the risk of inequality emerging.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
He criticized the government over the failure of its tax and economic policies, accusing it of ignoring experts. He called for the government's resignation or a change in policy.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
He criticized the regional minister for insufficient measures taken to reduce regional inequality. He demanded more radical steps and specific solutions.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
He/She criticized the prime minister over the narrow composition of the business council, accusing him/her of ignoring the wider society. He/She stressed the necessity of involving workers and civil society.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
He/She criticized the government for failing to support the standardization of family benefits, accusing them of political incivility. They emphasized the need for equal treatment of all children.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
They questioned the performance of the head of the Financial Supervisory Authority and inquired about future challenges. They demonstrated respect for the long tenure and an interest in the development of the sector.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
They criticized the Minister of Social Affairs over issues of healthcare financing and the integration of social services, while offering conditional support. They warned against implementing reforms forcefully without reaching an agreement with the target groups.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
He/She criticized the Minister of Defence over issues of trust concerning national defense and the Minister of Social Affairs for insufficient healthcare funding. He/She emphasized the need for personal accountability and additional funds.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
He/She persistently criticizes the Presidium of the Riigikogu and the government, accusing them of unfair treatment and procedural violations. He/She demands explanations concerning the preparation of the agenda and the organization of committee work.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The Reform Party is criticized for hypocrisy regarding kindergarten fees, specifically being accused of offering support only in Tallinn, rather than nationwide. It is pointed out that the government has funds for tax benefits for the wealthy, but not for supporting children, and this is labeled as political theater.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
He criticizes the Prime Minister for changing the Reform Party's position on the competition law issue, asking whether he considers himself more competent than Kaja Kallas. He accuses the government of supporting an oligopolistic market and demands accountability for any potential failures.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticizes the ministers for the insufficient handling of sensitive topics, citing the Pihlakodu case, the competition law, and the prison lease plan. Accuses the government of lacking empathy, factual basis, and transparency in its communication.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The government is accused of serving narrow business interests during the amendment of the competition law and of inadequately handling the Pihlakodu case. It also criticizes the government for its communication failures and demands transparency and honesty regarding sensitive matters.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The government's competitiveness policy is sharply criticized, highlighting the contradictions between its skilled labor policy and the prison rental scheme. The government is accused of inconsistency, and the question is raised as to why qualified workers are being used to guard prisoners while, simultaneously, foreign labor is being imported.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The piece humorously critiques the internal contradictions within the Reform Party, referring to the existence of "two Reform Parties"—one at the national level and one at the capital city level. It highlights inconsistencies regarding the Tallinn Hospital and traffic policy issues, accusing the party of lacking consistency.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The text criticizes the government for refusing to raise the subsistence level, pointing out that the exact same adjustment was made in 2022 through a supplementary budget. It accuses the government of mismanaging its priorities, arguing that funds are found for tax breaks benefiting the wealthy, but not for supporting low-income citizens.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
He/She criticizes the government's tax policy, accusing them of creating a regressive system that disproportionately burdens low-income earners. They cite specific examples of the impact of the VAT increase on different income groups and demand a fairer tax policy.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
They criticize the government for the failure of its environmental policy, highlighting the absence of a climate law, a forestry development plan, and clear agreements. They accuse the government of contradictory behavior: on the one hand, they champion the economy, but on the other, they are unable to integrate nature within those economic boundaries.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A direct oppositional position is not evident; the speaker does not criticize specific opponents or groups. Instead, concern is voiced regarding a systemic issue—the unequal accessibility of education.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
It criticizes the government for the inadequate preparation of the unemployment insurance reform and for failing to analyze the associated risks. It accuses the Reform Party (Reformierakond) and Eesti 200 of establishing a new political culture where decisions are made without involving interested stakeholders. It demands a better culture of inclusion and tripartite negotiations.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker adopts a clearly critical stance regarding the government's judicial reform, sharply questioning how it is possible that 33 years after the constitution was adopted, it is suddenly being alleged that the spirit or meaning of the constitution has been ignored or violated up until now. He/She employs ironic questions ("Perhaps we are the ones misunderstanding things now?") and demands clarification from the minister, indicating a deeply skeptical attitude toward the government's proposals.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker criticized the government's stance on the issues of care reform and healthcare funding, calling for more concrete steps and greater empathy. The criticism was constructive, yet demanding, focusing on the deficiencies in policy implementation.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct opposition stance is being expressed; the question is directed to the government constructively, seeking solutions to the problems. There is no criticism; rather, concern is being voiced regarding societal trends.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker consistently adopts an adversarial position toward the Reform Party and Eesti 200 government, criticizing them for weakening competition policy, capitulating to the business lobby, and ignoring social dialogue. The criticism is particularly sharp regarding the amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, where the government is accused of bypassing trade unions and undermining workers' rights. The speaker demands the withdrawal of specific draft bills and the search for compromises, while not ruling out potential cooperation.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker poses a critical question regarding the government’s tax policy, asserting that the current tax amendments (the VAT hike and income tax reforms, such as the removal of the tax kink) disproportionately hurt low-wage earners, while benefiting the wealthy. The critique is directed at the government’s general policy, rather than being a personal attack on the minister, and further expresses worry about the worsening accessibility of the cultural sector.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker launched a scathing attack on the Reform Party and other right-wing parties over the injustice of the tax system, accusing them of decades of favoring the wealthiest segment of society. Intense criticism was also leveled against the EKRE representative, who faces accusations of three criminal convictions and abuse of power in Tallinn. Furthermore, the speaker demanded that the Riigikogu debates maintain their focus strictly on the scheduled agenda topics. The critique is both intense and systematic, addressing both personal allegations and fundamental political points of contention.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker expresses strong opposition to the government, particularly concerning the minister whom he accuses of expanding the scope of the draft bill. The criticism targets both the political substance and the process itself—he accuses the government of ignoring feedback from stakeholders and doing the exact opposite of what was discussed during the consultations.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The commentator sharply criticizes the Reform Party regarding their conduct toward the Chancellor of Justice. He accuses the party both of employing an aggressive style and of leveling accusations of political interference against others. He demands that the Reform Party adopt a more humble and empathetic approach when responding to expert criticism, citing the attacks on the head of the Institute of Economic Research as another example. The critique is unambiguous and calls for a fundamental change in the party's behavior.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaker adopts a clearly oppositional stance toward the government, criticizing the Prime Minister for demagoguery and accusing the cabinet of ignoring social partners in the labor market. The critique is both policy-based (specifically the draft Employment Contracts Act) and procedural (misuse of the information hour/Q&A session). The speaker demands that the Speaker of the Riigikogu intervene regarding the conduct of government members during the information hour, stressing the opposition's limited ability to pose questions.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker criticizes the Government of the Republic for employing double standards, highlighting the contradiction between the gender balance requirements imposed on listed companies and the composition of the cabinet itself (nine men, four women). The criticism is primarily policy-driven, focusing on the lack of consistency in the government's actions. The speaker also expresses concern regarding the quality of the debate taking place in parliament, criticizing the approach as one that "digs for pretexts" or "seeks out petty excuses."
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data. The speech contains no criticism, resistance, or opposing viewpoints.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct confrontation or criticism of specific individuals or groups is evident. The speaker instead questions and examines existing processes, expressing indirect concern over the unresolved nature of the problem concerning long-term stateless persons. The approach is constructive, seeking clarification and solutions, rather than assigning blame.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It does not express direct opposition, but rather constructive criticism. It seeks clarification regarding Estonia's previous passivity in acceding to international conventions. It opposes claims made during the parliamentary debate that question the compatibility of equality and economic growth.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker does not express direct criticism towards specific individuals or parties, but instead focuses on presenting systemic criticism regarding the current dependency benefit system. The warning is directed towards the future coalition, urging them not to pursue cuts at the expense of the vulnerable, but this is presented more as setting conditions than as a direct attack. A willingness to compromise is clearly expressed—support is promised, provided that the principles of fairness are adhered to.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The speaker primarily criticizes the government's policy regarding foreign labor and party financing, yet maintains a constructive approach. Mr. Pohlak's "strange accusation" is mentioned directly, but the reasonable stance of the Social Democrats is highlighted. The criticism is mainly policy-focused, concentrating on procedural deficiencies—specifically, the failure to involve labor market stakeholders and the absence of restrictions on donations. A willingness to compromise is demonstrated by acknowledging the necessity of foreign labor in specific sectors.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is primarily aimed at the government led by the Reform Party, specifically targeting the prime minister and her team for neglecting population policy. The opposition is heavily focused on policy issues—accusing the government of systematically failing to address the demographic crisis and setting the wrong priorities. Criticism is also leveled against the previous prime minister for creating divisions among families, but it is stressed that this particular point is not directed at the current prime minister.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker directly criticizes the presenter’s one-sided approach and the overrepresentation of a small minority’s viewpoints. The criticism is primarily methodological and procedural, focusing on the absence of fair argumentation, not on personal attacks.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker adopts a clear opposition stance against the Reform Party and the government, sharply criticizing their tax policy. The main accusations concern raising the Value Added Tax (VAT) to 24%, tax decisions favoring the wealthy (specifically, the abolition of the tax hump/bracket), and plans for "drastic cuts" in healthcare and internal security. The criticism is systematic and principled, focusing on policy measures rather than personal attacks, although the tone remains consistently hostile.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker takes a clearly adversarial stance toward the current government, and especially Prime Minister Kristen Michal, criticizing them for ignoring the demographic crisis, facilitating the influx of foreign labor, and pursuing right-wing policies. The criticism is primarily policy-centric, focusing on specific areas such as tax incentives for businesses, cuts to support for disabled people, and the controversial nature of environmental policy. The opposition is intense and systemic, ruling out compromises on fundamental issues like population policy and social justice.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speech reveals no opposition or critical viewpoints. On the contrary, the emphasis is placed on consensus decision-making and constructive cooperation within the committee. The only comment concerns the Riigikogu's "overly active" participation in submitting amendments, but this was presented in a neutral tone, free of any accusations.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The speaker doesn't take a directly opposing stance; instead, they question Isamaa's position regarding e-voting. There is a reference to potential cooperation with EKRE and the Centre Party on the matter of banning e-elections, but this is framed as a hypothetical possibility rather than outright criticism. The overall approach is exploratory, not confrontational.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker sharply criticizes the "false naivety" prevalent in the parliamentary chamber regarding the situation in Georgia, stressing that some colleagues are treating a serious geopolitical issue as a "pseudo-problem." Criticism is particularly aimed at those politicians who underestimate Russia’s influence in Georgia, while underscoring that Russia is not a friendly nation to Estonia and its interference has been proven.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker criticizes the previous prime minister for the decision to exclude the Tallinn Hospital from the recovery funding, calling it the wrong decision. The speaker also expresses opposition to the political rhetoric contained in the draft bill’s explanatory memorandum, where the Centre Party is presented as the main negotiator with the European Commission, emphasizing that the negotiations were actually conducted by the government at the time, not the political party itself.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the public health law and criticizes the spread of pseudo-medicine. They condemn politicians who contribute to the dissemination of misinformation and endanger people's health.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker supports the introduction of a security tax but criticizes the overall tax system for its unfairness. They demand the implementation of a progressive income tax and an increase in wealth taxes.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The speech lacks direct criticism or opposition; rather, it consists of constructive questions directed at the minister. The approach is collaborative and information-seeking, not confrontational.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker provides a comprehensive overview of the debate on the draft bill concerning excise duty increases within the Finance Committee. He supports the rise in alcohol excise duty based on public health considerations, but acknowledges the impact of the tax burden on people.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It is neutrally noted that representatives of the EKRE, Centre Party, and Isamaa factions did not attend the committee meeting, but no criticism is voiced regarding their absence. Oppositional viewpoints are not expressed in the given address.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
He/She criticized the government's lack of a family policy and its disregard for the demographic crisis. He/She accused the prime minister of failing to address Estonia's low birth rate and the need to support families in his/her speeches.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
He/She expressed strong opposition to EKRE's motion of no confidence against Social Minister Karmen Joller. He/She criticized EKRE for promoting pseudo-medicine and anti-vaccination views, labeling it irresponsible.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
He/She sharply criticized the government's tax policy and economic strategy. He/She accused the coalition of increasing inequality and demanded the introduction of a progressive income tax and the lowering of VAT on foodstuffs.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker criticizes EKRE's conduct while presiding over the session and requests intervention from the chair. They demand proper decorum towards members of parliament and better management of the debate.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker criticizes the state budget priorities, arguing that they fail to improve people's livelihood. They support the implementation of a progressive income tax and a fairer distribution of the tax burden.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
He criticized the government's child protection policy and the inequity of the car tax system. He argued that the government fails to adequately protect vulnerable social groups and imposes unjust tax burdens.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The speaker raises questions regarding child protection issues and asks the minister to comment on the stance taken by the Prosecutor’s Office. The opposition is critical of the Prosecutor’s Office’s decision in the Pihlakodu case.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker questions the Minister of Regional Affairs regarding the broader understanding of regional policy across other ministries. The opposition is constructive, seeking to ensure the comprehensive handling of regional policy.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker asks the Chancellor of Justice about the situation regarding children's rights in light of the effects of the economic crisis. The opposition is concerned, wanting to know the crisis's impact on children's fundamental rights.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker asks the Minister of the Interior about the balance between funding internal security and ensuring people's livelihood. The opposition is constructive, seeking an optimal solution.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker provides an overview of the Finance Committee's work concerning the draft Competition Act. The opposition remains neutral, focusing on procedural information.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The speaker supports the Minister of Infrastructure against the motion of no confidence, criticizing EKRE's actions as exploiting the current political situation. He highlights the minister's actual achievements in supporting Ukraine.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The speaker supports the continuation of the pension increase, but expresses concern regarding the funding of the healthcare sector. They question the prime ministerial candidate about their commitment to healthcare.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker raises the issue of economic inequality and its impact on economic growth. The opposition is constructive, requesting an assessment of the inequality problem from the Bank of Estonia.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker inquires about the support for nuclear energy and criticizes the inconsistency between the bill's title and its content. They express concern that the draft legislation fails to provide a clear assessment regarding the support for nuclear energy.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker asks about the situation in Georgia and the European Union's countermeasures against Russia's influence activities. The opposition is constructive, focusing on diplomatic solutions.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports the Chancellor of Justice's proposal and calls on others to follow suit. The opposition is constructive, seeking to determine the full scope of the proposal's impact.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the amendments to the Health Care Services Organization Act. The opposition is constructive, recognizing the streamlining of family doctor care terminology and other positive amendments.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker asks about the security costs of nuclear energy and their compatibility with the current budget situation. They support the state budget amendments concerning the teachers' salary fund, but they are calling for tax reform.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker is asking about digitalization and the reasons for the low level of digitalization among businesses. The opposition is constructive, seeking to understand the root causes of the problem and the potential solutions the state can provide.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker notes the absence of the Centre Party faction members from the chamber just prior to the debate on their own draft legislation. He criticizes this as discourtesy toward colleagues and demands an explanation.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is inquiring about the impact of the education reform on special groups and children with special needs. Concern is expressed that the changes might leave the children who require the most attention without the necessary support.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker supports the state budget amendments for the teachers' wage fund, but emphasizes the need for a broader reform of the education sector. He calls for tax reform and the implementation of a progressive income tax.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker supports the statement regarding the Moscow Patriarchate and criticizes Patriarch Kirill's actions in inciting the war. They argue that the statement protects religious freedom and does not attack Orthodox believers.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker strongly backs the sweetened beverage tax, highlighting the consistency of the Social Democrats' political stance. They sharply criticize other parties for shifting their positions due to political expediency and accuse them of hypocrisy.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker raises questions regarding the framing of the nuclear energy debate, suggesting that similar countries should be compared. The opposition is constructive, seeking a more factually precise discussion concerning the introduction of nuclear energy.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is asking for specific solutions to the problems in the veterinary sector. The opposition is constructive, seeking practical input for developing the field and improving the structure of training placements.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker questions the Minister of Employment regarding foreign workforce policy and tripartite negotiations. He expresses skepticism about changes to the quota system being implemented without reaching an agreement with the trade unions.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports increasing the teachers' wage fund, but stresses that this is only a small step. They criticize the government for the lack of a collective agreement and demand a broad-based deal with education workers.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at proponents of private health insurance, who are referred to as representatives of the "alternative school of thought." It criticizes their positions as deepening inequality, but does so based on arguments, avoiding personal attacks. It stresses that private health insurance is neither a "silver bullet" nor a "magic wand" for solving healthcare problems. The possibility of compromise is not entirely ruled out, but the author firmly advocates for the primacy of a solidarity-based system.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker criticized the government's tax policy as unequal and favoring the wealthy, arguing that it deepens the societal divide. The critique was systemic and ideological, proposing a progressive income tax as an alternative.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation expressed with specific political forces. Instead, it criticizes systemic shortcomings and the slow action taken by previous governments in the area of social guarantees. Regarding Russia, it expresses skepticism about the country's trustworthiness, but does not adopt aggressive rhetoric, focusing instead on practical risk analysis.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Adopts a categorically hostile position towards Russia and personally towards Putin, labeling Russia the "empire of evil" and accusing it of war crimes. It also criticizes "naive politicians" who fail to grasp Russia's true objectives. It completely rules out any compromise with Russia and demands forceful resistance.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticized Urmas Reinsalu’s inconsistency regarding tax policy, citing his previous support for the VAT increase back in 2009. The criticism was fact-based and personal, focusing specifically on the shift in his political stance.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker voices criticism of the leaders of Hungary and Slovakia, negatively referencing their "remarks," although acknowledging that these have not always translated into concrete actions. The stance toward Russia is clearly hostile, demanding its withdrawal from Ukrainian territory.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No direct stance of opposition is expressed. The speaker instead questions and analyzes the background and rationale of previous decisions, without voicing clear criticism toward specific individuals or groups.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports the reduction of bureaucracy but requests clarification regarding the content of the draft bills. He criticizes the lack of consistency in EKRE's tax measures and demands clarity regarding their true intentions.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is calling for thorough preparatory work and a full risk analysis for all security-related bills. They express skepticism regarding fast-tracking the procedure and raise specific questions concerning clean water and environmental policy.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is presenting constructive criticism regarding the government's draft legislation, requesting clarification and voicing concern about the haste of the process. The opposition is cooperative, aiming to contribute to improving the bills and ensuring that no family or child is left without the necessary protection.