By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik
Total Sessions: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker criticizes the government for failing to support the abolition of kindergarten fees and the raising of the subsistence level. It is claimed that the Reform Party is acting hypocritically by demanding free kindergarten spots only in Tallinn, rather than nationwide.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The Prime Minister is criticized for reversing the Reform Party's position on the competition law issue. The question is raised whether the Prime Minister deems himself more competent than Kaja Kallas, and who will be held accountable if the European Commission proceeds with the penalty.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticizes the Minister of Justice for the failure to communicate effectively on sensitive issues. It is claimed that the handling of Pihlakodu, the prison lease, and the competition law has been opaque and does not serve the interests of the Estonian people.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticizes the amendments to the Competition Act and the regressiveness of the Estonian tax system. Argues that low-wage earners pay proportionally more than the wealthy, and asks why Europe differs from Estonia.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Criticizes the government's plan to export prison services and questions its viability. Argues that this harms Estonia's reputation and asks why these workers aren't being utilized to address the labor shortage.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticizes the Reform Party's internal communication problem at the national and municipal level. Asks about the amendments to the Tallinn traffic law and claims that the Reform Party at the national level and the capital's branch do not communicate with each other.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Criticizes the government for the supplementary budget lacking measures to improve people's livelihoods. Demands raising the subsistence level and asks about the conduct of the Prosecutor's Office in the Pihlakodu case.