By Plenary Sessions: Liina Kersna

The speaker's rhetorical style is analytical, authoritative, and concrete, relying heavily on logical arguments and budgetary comparisons. The tone is formal, fitting the role of a representative of the steering committee, but he incorporates personal experiences (eating school lunches) in defense of food quality. He uses historical facts (the EKRE government’s zero-euro salary increase) to criticize opponents and presents his views with conviction.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and question-oriented, addressing the Chancellor of Justice directly. The speaker employs logical argumentation, drawing upon scientific evidence and the shortcomings of the law, to highlight the necessity of legislative amendments. The tone is one of concern, but remains solution-oriented.

The style is formal and procedural, balancing sharp criticism directed at political opponents in the first address ("we express astonishment") with a positive, substantive presentation in the second address ("I have great pleasure in providing..."). The speaker concentrates on facts, the transparency of the process (the number of candidates, selection criteria), and the communication of subsequent steps.