By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

There is no direct confrontation; the criticism is instead aimed at the systemic injustice involved in bearing the environmental impacts of Ida-Virumaa, and the question is raised whether the concerns of the affected region were taken into account during the preparation of the legislation.

Insufficient data.

The main criticism is aimed at the representative of the Isamaa faction, who allegedly presented false accusations regarding the land tax increase and the creation of jobs "for insiders." The speaker categorically rejects these accusations, emphasizing that substantive competitions will be held. Despite refuting the accusations, a respectful tone towards the opposing representative is maintained.

The confrontation is potentially aimed at those ministries or ministers who have failed to provide all the requested answers, thereby emphasizing procedural accountability. While ideological differences are acknowledged, the criticism is focused on information deficiencies and a lack of transparency.