By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

The style is formal and interrogative, addressing the minister directly to obtain explanations and seek confirmation. The speaker employs an analytical approach, seeking confirmation of the logical rationale behind the legislative amendments and posing carefully considered questions regarding regional justice, while utilizing a moderate emotional reference to the suffering experienced by Ida-Virumaa.

The rhetorical style is polite, formal, and constructive, directed toward the esteemed Chairman and Minister. Logical argumentation is employed, supported by a specific anecdote (the notary's example), and the address concludes with a direct question to the Minister regarding the assessment of the perspective.

The style is analytical, serious, and somewhat concerned, especially regarding regional inequality and security issues. Logical arguments are employed, describing the consequences of policy (e.g., congestion, environmental impact), and emphasizing the necessity of strong state intervention. The tone is formal, but it also includes a personal appeal as a resident of a region far removed from the capital.

The style of the speech is initially conciliatory and appreciative, praising the committee chairman for the lack of an arrogant and aggressive tone. The overall tone is formal and focuses on a logical, procedural question regarding transparency, balancing courtesy and strict oversight.