By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

The criticism is directed at the current fragmented model of state governance and the processes that have fostered negative trends (e.g., traffic jams, kindergarten queues, urban sprawl). Specific political opponents or groups are not criticized; rather, the emphasis is placed on the need for a stronger state apparatus. Fragmented information and services also result in a fragmented vision for the future, which must be changed.

The criticism is aimed primarily at the sluggishness of the government's actions and bureaucratic delays (the 8-year process of the MaRu reform), rather than specific political opponents. Furthermore, a colleague's (Mart Maastik) obvious factual error regarding the ministry's area of administration is being corrected, emphasizing procedural accuracy.

The direct opponent is neither criticized nor named. They indirectly oppose the former centralized state administration, where the state dictated the terms of taxation to local governments, emphasizing that the new system is superior because "the state doesn't tell you to do this or that now."

Not enough data