By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

The style is formal and constructive, employing logical arguments and referencing a historical political consensus that dates back to 2018. The tone is moderately optimistic, yet it stresses the necessity of change and the significant weight of expectations in the current situation. The appeal is directed both at colleagues and the wider public ("Good people who are listening to and watching us").

The style is formal, procedural, and inquisitive, focusing primarily on determining the content of the commission's discussions and its substantive positions. The speaker employs logical arguments, stressing the necessity of reducing duplication and ensuring factual accuracy.

The rhetorical style is direct and probing, focusing on the specifics of the commission's discussion and the transparency of the procedure. The tone is positive and persuasive, emphasizing the positive reception of the political step at the local level. The speaker uses personal experience and conversations with local leaders to substantiate their claims.

The address is formal, professional, and supportive, focusing on the clarification and justification of the draft bill's details. The style is logical and analytical, emphasizing the significance of the legislative amendments from the perspective of clean sport and reducing bureaucracy. Emotional or personal appeals are not utilized; instead, reliance is placed on political arguments and the citation of statutory provisions.