By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The rhetorical style is logical, fact-based, and analytical, emphasizing the need to hold an "evidence-based debate" and avoid decisions driven by fear. The tone is simultaneously urgent, criticizing decades of indecision that have harmed Estonia. The speaker employs detailed explanations and temporal frameworks to support their arguments.

The rhetorical style is explanatory, logical, and technically detailed, with the goal of refuting skeptical claims that have been voiced. The tone is matter-of-fact and at times defensive, emphasizing the need for technological literacy to understand the system. Analogies (world banking) and technical facts are used to support the arguments, while avoiding emotional appeals.

The style of discourse is extremely formal, neutral, and informative. The tone is descriptive and focuses on conveying facts, dates, voting results, and procedural decisions. Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is purely on logical and procedural reporting to the full assembly.

The rhetorical style is formal, precise, and analytical, with the objective of "clarifying technical details for the record." The argumentation is purely logical and fact-based, focusing on explaining the technical reality in order to resolve a legal dispute. The tone is neutral and matter-of-fact.