By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The rhetorical style is aggressive, accusatory, and skeptical, employing direct questions and expressing doubt regarding the minister's honesty ("you have something to hide"). Sharp language is utilized, referring to the government as the "Ref yoke government," and political responsibility is underscored by linking the topic to a potential motion of no confidence against Prime Minister Kristen Michal.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and accusatory, employing emotional comparisons, such as likening the supervision to an "inquisition." The tone is concerned about the well-being of teachers and expresses indignation regarding the ministry's attitude. The speaker uses direct questions and contrasts the ministry's rhetoric with the actual efforts of the teachers.

The rhetorical style is serious, principled, and cautionary, focusing strongly on logical and legal arguments. The speaker uses quotes from the President of the Republic, Alar Karis, as an authoritative source to underscore the connections between the rule of law and security. He employs an emotional appeal, referencing the unfair penalization of those who are unable to renounce their Russian citizenship.

The rhetorical style is confrontational and critical, accusing the government of ramming through an emotionally complex piece of legislation and demonstrating an unwillingness to find solutions. Both logical argumentation (specifically, the demand for an impact assessment) and a strong moral appeal are employed, including a biblical quote used to criticize the opponent's unreasonableness.

The rhetorical style is critical and direct, using emotional appeal (the plight of the elderly in Narva) to back up concrete facts (profit figures). The tone is combative, accusing banks of unethical profiteering and the government of protecting them. Simple and effective examples are used to illustrate the complexity of the situation.

The style is predominantly critical, demanding, and skeptical, posing sharp questions to the prime minister regarding the rationale and transparency of the decisions. Logical appeals are employed, referencing media (Delfi) and expert opinions, as well as statistical data (PPA call-outs). The tone is direct, demanding accountability and the full disclosure of the truth concerning the Nordica case.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the presiding officer and the rapporteur. The rhetoric is direct and inquiry-based, focusing on determining a specific political position based on factual premises.