By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's energy policy, particularly concerning the €2.6 billion subsidy for offshore wind farms, which is viewed as a burden imposed upon the public. The focus is on the lack of transparency and incompetence in the government's actions, stressing that decisions were made without proper calculations. The political framework is heavily results-oriented and centers on the failure of the government's performance.

The political position is highly critical of the Ministry of Education and Research's actions in Narva schools, particularly concerning the methods used to supervise the transition to Estonian-language instruction. This stance is outcome-based, focusing on the negative impact of the ministry's activities on teachers' job satisfaction and stress levels. The speaker suspects that the supervision is politically motivated and resembles an "inquisition," the goal of which is to find culprits rather than support educators.

The political position is firmly against revoking the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections. This stance is value-based, emphasizing constitutional equality, the principles of the rule of law, and the importance of integration within Estonian society. The speaker warns that restricting rights merely on the basis of citizenship damages the country's cohesion and international reputation.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing its criticism on the government's actions regarding both substantive issues (the defense of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate) and procedural deficiencies (the absence of an impact analysis). This stance is value-based, stressing the principles of the rule of law and religious freedom, while simultaneously accusing the government of avoiding necessary solutions.

The political stance is strongly critical of the government, which defends the large profits of banks—profits derived from high Euribor rates, not from good work or performance. The most prominent issue is banking regulation and social responsibility, emphasizing the prioritization of people's well-being over the profits of financial institutions. The stance is strongly value- and results-based, criticizing a system where profits are generated "at the expense of the people."

A strong opposition stance, focusing on government inefficiency and the waste of taxpayer money, particularly the allocation of 100 million euros to the Narva gas plant. The main issues are energy dependence, high electricity prices, and the need for transparency in government operations, supporting the formation of the Nordica investigative committee. The political framework is clearly results-oriented and critical of current decisions that contradict declared objectives.

The political focus is on international relations and the protection of allied relationships. The speaker is seeking clarity on Estonia's official position regarding US President Trump's interest in acquiring Greenland, while emphasizing Denmark's status as an ally. The stance is information-gathering and policy-driven, centering on the interests of the allies.