By Plenary Sessions: Diana Ingerainen

The rhetorical style is balanced, combining emotional appeals (home, security, the fear of an empty stomach) with strong logical and economic argumentation. The speech is formal and analytical, progressing from a personal introduction to political conclusions. The style is persuasive, stressing that simple solutions to complex problems are rarely the right ones.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and highly empathetic, focusing on themes of compassion and human dignity. The speaker employs logical arguments (budget and investment figures) along with a moral appeal, stressing that no one should have to endure avoidable suffering or be left isolated. The tone is one of concern, yet constructive, urging responsible and judicious action.

Insufficient data

The style of discourse is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the reporting of the commission's work results, voting outcomes, and expert input. The arguments are primarily logical and data-driven, emphasizing the analyses and the absence of guarantees. The tone remains neutral, even when a motion for rejection is presented.

The style of the speech is formal and respectful, using direct addresses to the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the Minister. The rhetoric is logical and centers on a procedural matter (the temporal control of the metrics), stressing the necessity of avoiding overly rigid regulation.

The style of discourse is formal, neutral, and strictly procedural. The focus is on conveying facts (dates, participants, decisions), and emotional or rhetorical appeals are absent. Responses are short and specific; for instance, when asked whether something had been discussed, he simply answered in the negative.