By Agendas: Diana Ingerainen

It favors fiscal discipline and targeted subsidies over universal tax cuts, aiming to prevent the loss of hundreds of millions of euros from the budget. It supports stronger competition and regulatory oversight (the Competition Authority) in the supply chain to ensure fair prices. It advocates supporting low-income individuals by raising the tax-free income threshold.

The economic platform supports responsible and smart strategic investment utilizing European Union funds, allocating money specifically to the social sector and welfare services. The emphasis is placed on ensuring social well-being, increasing pensions, and securing the future through long-term agreements. He/She supports the utilization of investment opportunities totaling 6.5 billion euros.

Insufficient data

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and are skeptical of broad tax cuts that generate budget deficits without a guaranteed impact on prices. Support is given to assisting economically vulnerable groups through direct benefits, rather than via market intervention (e.g., price setting). Reference is made to analyses showing the lack of long-term impact from tax reductions.

Economic perspectives emphasize the necessity of flexible regulation that accounts for the rapid advancement of science and technology. This indicates support for adaptive fiscal discipline and opposition to rigid budgetary methods that impede progress.

Economic perspectives are linked to international tax policy and treaties aimed at preventing double taxation. This indicates support for regulating the international economic environment and streamlining business operations.

Economic outlooks support the positive impact that employment growth and increased tax revenue have on economic recovery. However, emphasis is also placed on the necessity of determining the nature of the jobs being offered to young people and what the long-term effect of these jobs will be on their careers. A critical point raised is the lack of a comprehensive labor policy that addresses both taxation and the overall effects of taxes.

We support the reassessment and channeling of national resources into defense, while recognizing the scarcity of resources and the need for compromises. Preference is given to a flexible and decisive fiscal policy that responds quickly to unforeseen threats.

Not enough data.

There is insufficient data regarding economic views. The talk focuses on the organizational and ethical aspects of healthcare, not economic policy.

Support for maintaining the existing excise duties on energy carriers is indirectly expressed, given that the proposal to reject the draft bill was submitted. This points to a fiscal consideration or opposition to the specific tax relief sought by Draft Bill 627 SE.

There is not enough data.

Economic views emphasize fiscal responsibility and budget stability, strongly opposing the draft legislation that would result in a 400 million euro budget shortfall. Furthermore, adherence to current tax structures and EU directives, which limit the number of reduced tax rates, is considered crucial. Budget balancing is preferred through the elimination of certain activities.

Economic views: Supports fiscal discipline and opposes tax changes that would have a significant negative impact on the budget. Is skeptical about the effectiveness of lowering VAT in reducing prices, emphasizing the need to explore alternative measures to help consumers. Acknowledges the rising cost of food production.

Insufficient data