By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The confrontation is directed against the Reform Party government and Climate Minister Yoko Alender, who stands accused of personal incompetence and a pattern of lying. The criticism is intense and personal, leveling accusations of massive corruption and ties to businessmen against government members (Alender, Kasemets, Michal, Keldo). Compromise is ruled out, as the opposition views the other side as the executor of a criminal "plunder scheme" protected by the justice system.

The criticism is aimed at the excessive broadening of the procedural focus during the discussion of the ordinary law, which indicates dissatisfaction with the process. Specific opponents or political groupings are not named.

Strong opposition is directed at the coalition, and especially the Social Democrats ("Sots"), who are accused of blackmail and imposing a solution that undermines the constitution. The criticism is both political (substantive) and procedural (concerning the coalition's voting strategy). Compromise is categorically ruled out because it does not align with a clean solution.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and its ministers (Kristen Michal, Jürgen Ligi, Lauri Läänemets, Keit Kasemets), who stand accused of corruption, lying, and arrogance. The criticism is predominantly personal and moral, extending to accusations of insulting allies and attacking the nation-state. Compromise is ruled out; the goal is the immediate toppling of the government, as every day they remain in power harms Estonia.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who stand accused of double standards, tolerating corruption, and unconstitutional conduct. The criticism is intense and ideological, labeling the opposition as "far-left" and violators of democracy. Lauri Läänemets and Hanah Laht are being particularly sharply attacked for undermining allied relations.

The primary adversaries are the government as a whole (a question of mandate) and, specifically, colleague Läänemets. The criticism is intense and multi-layered, encompassing both foreign policy errors (the breach of allied relations) and personal attacks and insinuations.