By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The rhetorical style is extremely aggressive, accusatory, and emotional, employing repeated charges of lying and incompetence ("you lie, you lie, you lie"). Powerful metaphors ("perpetuum mobile," "mole hill") and irony are utilized to underscore the extent of the corruption. The tone is superior and ruthless, focusing on moral appeals and the discrediting of opponents.

The rhetorical style is direct, questioning, and rather informative, employing slight hyperbole in the initial address to criticize the complexity of the procedure. The language used is everyday and focuses on establishing concrete facts, particularly concerning the topic of beekeeping.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, dramatic, and urgent, employing strong negative metaphors such as "rotten egg" and "defiling the constitution." The appeal targets core values and a sense of threat, stressing that any compromise will weaken the constitution and that this issue will not be revisited. The speaker also uses accusatory language, referencing the opponents' "extortion" and "aggressor state rhetoric."

The rhetorical style is extremely aggressive, accusatory, and emotional, focusing on moral condemnation (lying, corruption, arrogance). It employs repetitive and intense labeling (e.g., "tankist," "incompetent governance," "blatant lie") and stands in stark opposition to the tradition of respectful debate. The objective is the discrediting of the opponent, not consensus, stressing that the government is making "terribly wrong decisions."

The rhetorical style is highly confrontational and accusatory, employing strongly emotional and sharp language (e.g., "ranting," "far-left," "duplicity"). The speaker emphasizes the opponents' double standards and dishonesty, attempting to paint the government as a force violating democracy and the constitution. Repeated references are made to previous political events and figures (Hanah Lahe, Donald Trump).

The rhetorical style is highly aggressive and accusatory, employing emotional and descriptive expressions such as "stabbed in the back" and "ranting." Direct personal insinuations are used (such as mentioning alcohol residue/hangover symptoms), and the opposing side is required to immediately smooth over the situation. The tone is confrontational and demands accountability.