Agenda Profile: Martin Helme
Rule of Law
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
Political Position
The political position centers on strong opposition to the government's actions, which are deemed violations of the principles of the rule of law and constitutional freedoms (private property, freedom of speech, presumption of innocence). The speaker accuses the government of abusing its power and establishing a liberal regime that is moving away from the rule of law. This position is strongly value-based, emphasizing the necessity for the constitution to be upheld by the government and the police alike.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in Estonian constitutional and criminal law, citing specific sections (e.g., § 12) and the principles of the rule of law. Particular emphasis is placed on the violation of constitutional rights (the inviolability of private property, the presumption of innocence) by the government and the police. Criticism is also directed at the selective and incorrect application of Section 151¹ of the Penal Code.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and emotional, employing sharp expressions such as "mafioso-like" and "thought crime." The speaker strongly emphasizes the legal violations committed by the government and the police, appealing to constitutional values and historical memory. While the tone is formal, the content is confrontational, demanding a specific evaluation from the prime minister regarding the interior minister's actions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponents are the liberal government, the Prime Minister, and Interior Minister Läänemets, who are accused of trampling on constitutional rights. The criticism is intense and accusatory, focusing on the abuse of power, selective enforcement of laws, and unequal treatment (e.g., comparing the cases of the Bronze Soldier and the Lihula monument). There is no willingness to compromise, as the government's actions are being labeled illegal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is primarily national, centering on constitutional rights and government actions within Estonia. The specific example of the Lihula monument provides a regional starting point, but it is utilized to illustrate national issues concerning the rule of law and questions of historical memory.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, strong emphasis is placed on civil liberties, such as freedom of opinion and conscience, and the inviolability of private property. The speaker opposes police activities that are referred to as "thought crime" and a violation of the presumption of innocence. The theme of historical memory is also central, demanding equal treatment when commemorating those who defended the continuity of the Republic of Estonia.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on opposing the selective and improper application of existing laws, particularly § 151¹ of the Penal Code (justification of an international crime). The speaker is a critic and opponent of the government’s interpretation of laws that violate people’s fundamental rights. The aim is to prevent the use of laws to punish "thought crimes."
2 Speeches Analyzed