By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The speaker demonstrates expertise in parliamentary procedure (motion of no confidence) and international criminal law, demanding that the International Criminal Court specify the concrete charges in the accusations against Putin. The text also emphasizes the speaker's knowledge of political communication and voter demographics, particularly concerning voters who hold Russian citizenship.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Rules of Procedure of the Riigikogu and the legislation of the Republic of Estonia, particularly in the area of violations of the Penal Code and the Constitution. The emphasis is on legal and procedural issues, demanding clarification regarding sanctions and liability.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker focuses on analyzing the social and political consequences, linking the tax hikes (car tax and VAT) to a national catastrophe and systemic corruption. A public opinion poll is cited, showing 73% opposition to the car tax, but more detailed economic or technical data are lacking. The expertise presented consists primarily of moral and systemic criticism.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The speaker demonstrates awareness of the economic breaking point, questioning the maximum burden (taxes and obligations) that can be imposed on society and businesses without causing a collapse. Furthermore, expertise in energy policy is evident, linking the rising price of fossil fuels to the green transition and the CO2 tax. A substantive procedural question was also raised concerning the application of the Riigikogu's Rules of Procedure and the Election Law during a transition of government.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of constitutional review procedures, referencing the Supreme Court and the potential involvement of a panel of legal experts. Furthermore, they possess a specific understanding of the economic situation and hardships faced by the residents of Kihnu Island, which they use as an example of the negative effects of tax policy.