By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The speaking style is extremely combative, emotional, and provocative, utilizing powerful metaphors (such as 'an axe between the eyes' or 'the bacchanalia of liberals') and overtly accusatory language. The appeals are primarily emotional and moral, leveling accusations of irresponsibility, negligence, and shamelessness against opponents. Rather than relying on logical arguments, the rhetoric emphasizes the decline in people's living standards and employs religious language ('the Lord in heaven sees everything').

The speaking style is extremely combative, aggressive, and condemnatory, employing strong emotional appeals and extreme terminology such as "demagoguery," "agony," and "horrible end." Personal attacks ("stupider," "baser," "more deceitful") are used to characterize the opponent, and the appeal is made to morality and values rather than data.

The tone of voice is formal, polite, and strictly interrogative ("Thank you!", "I am interested to know if I may also find out?"). The rhetoric is logical and evidence-based, aimed at obtaining specific information regarding the commission's voting results and the dissenters.