By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The political position centers on strong opposition to the government’s fiscal policy, particularly the car tax, which is seen as an attack on property rights and the wallets of ordinary citizens. Another crucial issue is the constitutionality of e-elections, demanding a clear and unambiguous stance from the Supreme Court regarding the contradictions involved. The political framework is strongly value-based (property rights) and highly critical of the government’s activities.

The political position is one of strong opposition, characterizing the government as a regime in agony that violates laws and imposes taxes. The main issue is the opposition to the car tax, which is framed as a violation of constitutional rights and the inviolability of private property. They maintain a strong values-based platform, emphasizing the government's incompetence, deceitfulness, and hostility toward the people.

The political stance focuses on the transparency of the legislative process and demanding accountability. Specific interest is directed at which representative opposed the bill being discussed in the committee and how they voted. The focus is on the procedural level, not the substance of the bill.