By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The main opponent is the current government, which is sharply criticized for neglecting internal security and failing to establish a crisis reserve. The government's efforts to secure the external border (dragon's teeth, ditch) are deemed ineffective and politically engineered. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, accusing the government of fueling the hysteria.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and Minister Kristen Michal, who stands accused of widespread corruption, distributing financial resources to friends and relatives, and jeopardizing national security. The attacks are intense and personal, referencing both earlier scandals (the plastic bag affair) and current major projects.

The objection is directed at those who engage in labeling questioners and bystanders, and discussing personal topics (e.g., Mart Helme's age or physical condition). The criticism is aimed at procedural impropriety and the use of personal attacks in the work of parliament.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Estonia 200, who are accused of destroying the state and engaging in populism. Criticism is aimed both at policy (the car tax) and at specific individuals, especially Kaja Kallas, who is considered the primary instigator of the catastrophe. The intensity of the attacks is very high, with the government even being accused of pursuing a course of action that aligns with the interests of the Kremlin.