By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The political focus is heavily directed toward internal security and the threat posed by the fifth column, which is viewed as a greater risk than the inadequate protection of the external border. The speaker strongly criticizes the government's inaction and urgently calls for the creation of a 3,000-strong crisis reserve to neutralize domestic conflicts. The political framework is strongly performance-based, centering on the government's failure to defend the state.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the current government’s (the Reform Party’s) alleged corruption within major energy projects (specifically wind farms) and the defense industry. He/She expresses vehement opposition to risking Estonia’s security by triggering NATO Article 4, deeming such an action irresponsible and a move toward dragging the country into war. His/Her positions are firmly rooted in values (anti-corruption) and results (specifically, the cost of border construction).

The political position is strongly procedural, emphasizing the need to focus on the first reading of the state budget as the only legitimate topic at the moment. The speaker opposes personal attacks and labeling, demanding that the debate be redirected back to political substance.

The political position is strongly anti-government (targeting the Reform Party and Eesti 200), centering on the demand to abolish the car tax and the registration fee. This stance is forcefully presented, accusing the government of putting the country on a path to ruin, leading to economic and demographic collapse. The focus is overwhelmingly on emphasizing the failure and cynicism of the government's actions (this critique is performance-driven).