By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The cooperation style is conditional and pragmatic: support for Isamaa’s border bill is granted based on a matter of principle (closing the border with the aggressor state), not as a political favor. In return, a quid pro quo is demanded from Isamaa, specifically their support for withdrawing from the Istanbul Convention. The speaker stresses that they do not trust Isamaa and will not accept half-measures.

The speeches contain no references to cooperation or seeking compromise with other parties, focusing instead on defending the policies of their own parliamentary group (EKRE) and sharply criticizing the government's actions. The approach to engagement is strictly oppositional, intended to cast doubt on the government's legitimacy and competence.

The speaker acknowledges the presenter and other parties who are waging a fight regarding the issue of e-elections, noting that "it is not only EKRE that is fighting this battle." This indicates a readiness to recognize and potentially support others who share the same objective in criticizing the e-voting system.

The cooperative style is poor because the government is being demanded to withdraw the draft bill, citing recommendations from opposition MPs. When communicating with coalition partners, the tone is accusatory, and there is no apparent willingness to compromise with the government.

No data available

It demonstrates cooperation with fellow opposition members by publicly agreeing with Kalle Grünthal's stance that processing the matter is impossible. The cooperation centers on ensuring the parliament’s procedural rules are followed and obstructing the handling of the government’s draft legislation, highlighting a shared concern regarding the lack of necessary documentation.

The speaker supports the initiative put forward by Lauri Laats (Centre Party), demonstrating a readiness to cooperate with opposition parties in solving social problems. However, the conviction was also expressed that the coalition will vote the draft bill down, which points to a lack of opportunities for cooperation with the governing parties.