By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The speaker referred to the repeated nature of the action, noting that they have previously raised the topic of e-voting and its dangers in the Riigikogu chamber during earlier debates as well. This indicates a consistent pattern of highlighting this specific issue during plenary sessions.

The speaker actively participates in plenary sessions and debates, referencing previous discussions (e.g., Jürgen Ligi's opinion) and the previous day's information hour. This pattern of activity demonstrates a readiness to intervene in ongoing political debates and pose critical questions.

Data is scarce.

The speaker actively participates in the Riigikogu information sessions, using this platform to sharply criticize the government’s recent decisions and current scandals (including the nursing home cases and social benefit cuts). These patterns of activity suggest a reactive approach to fast-moving events and the government's operational agenda.

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, posing questions to the minister and participating in debates on bills, often addressing a colleague directly. Their pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on both social justice and economic regulations. All the speeches provided originate from the same session day, which suggests intense participation in the debates.

The debate has been concentrated into a single plenary session (14.04.2025), during which interpellations regarding the Prime Minister's tenure and energy policy will be answered. The speaker references earlier activity, including the raising of the legitimacy issue during the information session.