By Months: Anti Haugas
Total Months: 8
Fully Profiled: 8
11.2025
1 Speeches
The style is formal and interrogative, addressing the esteemed Minister within the framework of a parliamentary session. The tone is professional and constructive, focusing on logical arguments and the search for practical solutions to the challenges of industrial development.
10.2025
2 Speeches
The discourse is formal, neutral, and purely informative, focusing on conveying the commission's decisions, dates, and procedural progress. The style is logical and fact-based, utilizing official terminology (e.g., infringement procedure, first reading). Emotional or persuasive appeals are absent.
09.2025
3 Speeches
The rhetorical style is interrogative, formal, and analytical. The speaker poses structured questions, seeking specific data and comparisons regarding the impact of political decisions. The tone is professional and focuses on the logical, evidence-based collection of information.
06.2025
20 Speeches
The style is formal, analytical, and at times urgent, particularly concerning the processing of the security-related bill before the end of the session. The appeals are predominantly logical, relying on legal clarity and practical examples (a kidnapped child, Lithuanian car thieves). He/She frequently employs the form of asking questions and responds to specific details, but is also critical of the opposition's historical inaction.
04.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, explanatory, and persuasive, aiming to justify the necessity of the legislation and counter arguments regarding the restriction of religious freedom. Logical arguments are employed, directly connecting the need for the law to security threats and the justification of war crimes (Patriarch Kirill, Putin’s actions in Ukraine). The tone is confident and urges support for the bill.
03.2025
3 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal and procedural, particularly when providing an overview of the Legal Affairs Committee session. When questions are posed, the tone is analytical and centered on identifying practical solutions, emphasizing logical deliberation and the assessment of consequences.
02.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is serious and persuasive, combining legal argumentation (bringing the law into compliance) with a strong emotional appeal. The speaker emphasizes Kirill's use of the concept of war crimes (deaths, rapes) and "holy war" to justify the urgent need for the law's adoption. The speaker is direct, repeatedly calling Kirill a war criminal.
01.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, logical, and analytical, addressing colleagues and employing expert terminology. The speaker relies heavily on economic logic and the efficiency argument, raising a philosophical question about state inefficiency and how to prevent the enrichment of merchants. The tone is critical of the proposed solution, but avoids personal attacks.