By Months: Anti Haugas
Total Months: 16
Fully Profiled: 16
10.2025
1 Speeches
The discourse is formal, neutral, and purely informative, focusing on conveying the commission's decisions, dates, and procedural progress. The style is logical and fact-based, utilizing official terminology (e.g., infringement procedure, first reading). Emotional or persuasive appeals are absent.
09.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is interrogative, formal, and analytical. The speaker poses structured questions, seeking specific data and comparisons regarding the impact of political decisions. The tone is professional and focuses on the logical, evidence-based collection of information.
06.2025
20 Speeches
The style is formal, analytical, and at times urgent, particularly concerning the processing of the security-related bill before the end of the session. The appeals are predominantly logical, relying on legal clarity and practical examples (a kidnapped child, Lithuanian car thieves). He/She frequently employs the form of asking questions and responds to specific details, but is also critical of the opposition's historical inaction.
04.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, explanatory, and persuasive, aiming to justify the necessity of the legislation and counter arguments regarding the restriction of religious freedom. Logical arguments are employed, directly connecting the need for the law to security threats and the justification of war crimes (Patriarch Kirill, Putin’s actions in Ukraine). The tone is confident and urges support for the bill.
03.2025
3 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal and procedural, particularly when providing an overview of the Legal Affairs Committee session. When questions are posed, the tone is analytical and centered on identifying practical solutions, emphasizing logical deliberation and the assessment of consequences.
02.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is serious and persuasive, combining legal argumentation (bringing the law into compliance) with a strong emotional appeal. The speaker emphasizes Kirill's use of the concept of war crimes (deaths, rapes) and "holy war" to justify the urgent need for the law's adoption. The speaker is direct, repeatedly calling Kirill a war criminal.
01.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, logical, and analytical, addressing colleagues and employing expert terminology. The speaker relies heavily on economic logic and the efficiency argument, raising a philosophical question about state inefficiency and how to prevent the enrichment of merchants. The tone is critical of the proposed solution, but avoids personal attacks.
12.2024
4 Speeches
The style is formal and analytical, heavily relying on statistics and facts, particularly concerning criminal policy. The tone is generally optimistic about the progress made (the decline in violent crime), yet stresses the necessity of allocating resources to preventative work. In shorter remarks, the speaker frequently employs questions to clarify legal and regulatory details, signaling a commitment to accuracy.
11.2024
2 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal and procedural, particularly in commission reports, where the focus is placed on facts and procedural decisions. In the economic speech, the tone is positive and inquisitive, emphasizing logical argumentation and the utilization of data (e.g., 1% of the European economy). Emotional appeals are not employed; the focus remains strictly on informativeness.
10.2024
6 Speeches
The rhetorical style is predominantly critical and confrontational, particularly when addressing parliamentary procedure. He/She employs strong emotional language, repeatedly labeling opponents' behavior as "embarrassing" and accusing them of "making a circus while keeping a straight face." At the same time, he/she is direct in questioning and focused on finding solutions.
09.2024
2 Speeches
The tone is urgent and determined, stressing that the crises have opened a brief window of opportunity for action, necessitating joint efforts. The style is formal, balancing logical arguments (the need for funding and infrastructure) with praise for local initiatives and personal anecdotes (a friend from Võrumaa).
06.2024
3 Speeches
The speaker's rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and analytical, especially in the reporting of the committee's work. Regarding social topics, the tone is rather reflective and geared toward posing questions to advance the importance of outreach and awareness. He/She balances logical arguments (cost vs. benefit) with value-based appeals (a normal relationship).
05.2024
6 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the neutral presentation of the commission's decisions and procedural actions. It utilizes logical arguments and data (e.g., cost estimates, consensus decisions) and is straightforward in addressing procedural issues, such as a motion to terminate obstruction.
04.2024
1 Speeches
The style is analytical and proposing solutions, focusing on solving specific problems within the sports sector, using phrases such as "just for thought" and "that is one idea of mine." The speaker employs logical arguments and numerical estimates (200,000 – 300,000 euros), calling for a debate, which indicates a measured and substantive approach.
03.2024
4 Speeches
The style is analytical and measured, focusing on logical arguments and the assessment of social consequences. The speaker adopts an empathetic approach, particularly when discussing women suffering from violence, and backs up his positions with personal observations and experiences (such as being a volunteer police officer and a family man). He also makes procedural comments when addressing the chair of the session.
02.2024
1 Speeches
The speaker's rhetorical style is informative and casual, focusing on personal observation and confirming facts. The tone is neutral and conversational, utilizing simple language to convey specific knowledge ("I just wanted to mention").