By Plenary Sessions: Anti Haugas

The style is formal and data-driven, addressing the audience as "Honorable members of the Riigikogu! Dear colleagues!" The tone is generally optimistic (referencing progress made in reducing violent crimes and a low perception of crime), but also includes an urgent note concerning juvenile drug issues and recidivism. Logical appeals and statistical comparisons with the European Union are used to support the arguments.

The style of discourse is investigative and reflective, presenting the question as a novel idea ("an intriguing question," "A thought simply occurred to me"). The approach is logical and theoretical, focusing on the feasibility of the political solution. The tone is neutral and information-seeking.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and focuses on political inquiry and clarifying legislative details. The tone is constructive and inquisitive, presenting the idea as a further development upon the existing consensus, without emotional or personal appeals.

The rhetorical style is interrogative, analytical, and formal, emphasizing the necessity of correctness ("I ask in order to be correct"). The speaker employs logical appeal, attempting to clarify the differences between legal concepts in a businesslike and neutral tone.