By Plenary Sessions: Anti Haugas

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and concerned, focusing on logical arguments regarding the system's sustainability. The speaker presents facts (demographic shift, diminished responsibility) and concludes with a pointed question about long-term policy, seeking the opposing side's personal opinion.

The rhetorical style is direct, formal, and interrogative. The speaker poses clear, policy-focused questions regarding future plans and measures, emphasizing the development and refinement of services. The first address is procedural and resolute, offering a concrete proposal to end the obstruction.

The style is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on conveying the decisions and discussions of the Legal Committee in the role of a rapporteur. The speaker relies on logical arguments and facts, such as consensus decisions and economic calculations, to justify the legislative amendments. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is on procedural accuracy.