By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The style is formal and analytical, but becomes emotional and urgent when addressing crimes that shock society, such as vigilantism committed by minors and serious crimes against the person. The speaker balances logical argumentation when defending the budget with strong emotional appeals regarding the necessity of ensuring justice and security. He repeatedly uses phrases like "shocked" and "deeply offends society."

The rhetorical style is formal, factual, and procedural, making it suitable for the role of a committee rapporteur. The speaker focuses on logical arguments, thoroughly explaining the procedural history of the draft legislation, the substance of the debates, and the rationale behind the proposed amendments. Emotional appeals are avoided; the emphasis is placed on facts, consensus, and the specifics of the legislative process.