By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The style is formal and questioning, respectfully addressing the director and the minister. The speaker uses logical argumentation, identifying a specific political conflict (bottom-up vs. centralization) and requesting clarification and considerations from the minister regarding the possibility of centralization.

The language used is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairperson and the presenter. The rhetorical style is primarily logical and question-driven, focusing on clarifying the details of the draft proposal and its practical feasibility. There are no emotional or aggressive elements; the emphasis is on explanation and logical consistency from a health perspective.