By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The cooperation style is pragmatic and regional: it is mentioned that the Social Democrats support the bill, citing cross-party backing on the security issue. Furthermore, the text emphasizes that similar conclusions have been reached with neighboring countries (Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland), which indicates regional political alignment.

Cooperative, emphasizing the committee's consensus decisions and its readiness to amend the law in order to address the concerns raised by the President regarding legal clarity. It refers to the shared opinion of the Ministry of the Interior and members of the Legal Committee concerning the feasibility of security aspects. The goal is to find a solution that satisfies both security needs and the requirements for legal clarity.

The cooperation style shows a readiness to voice disagreements with colleagues ("Contrary to the colleague"), indicating an independent position. Data is lacking regarding broader cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other factions.

The speaker urges open and constructive cooperation during the discussion of the Arms Act, particularly regarding the reduction of bureaucracy. He confirms readiness to discuss the rules with hunters and members of the Defense League, provided it concerns improving the conditions for existing gun owners.

The speaker’s style is geared towards cooperation, posing questions to the minister and requesting the ministry’s input on the proposed solutions. He/She seeks to establish shared instruments and an action plan with the government to reduce fraud, referencing the need to consolidate best practices.

Insufficient data.

The speaker directly refers to the issues raised by other colleagues (Reili, Tanel Kiik, Rene Kokk), continuing their discussion and building their own questions upon those points. This suggests cooperation and coordination of topics within the faction or the opposition.