By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is being intensely criticized, and association with which is considered abnormal by the speaker. The criticism is directed at systemic injustice and the distribution of resources, positioning EKRE and other marginalized groups ("those left outside") as victims of unfair treatment.

The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Climate and the Health Board for their lack of knowledge and inaction, which allows construction work to continue. Opposition is also directed at a specific presenter, who is being pressed for fact-based answers and is accused of giving vague replies and invoking the use of "common sense." The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural failure.

The main opposition is aimed at the current rules of procedure, which permit the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK) to adopt decisions, and at the coalition MPs who defend this delegation of authority. The criticism is intense and strictly procedural, challenging the Riigikogu's right to delegate such powers. The rapporteur is also considered an opponent, as they refuse to assess the constitutionality of the draft bill.

The primary targets are the government and "the ruling clique," who stand accused of running the economy into the ground and disregarding public health risks. Specific individuals under fire include spokesperson Annely Akkermann (for denying the economic reality) and her colleague Karmen Joller (for lying about infrasound). The attacks are intense, featuring accusations of being struck blind, suppressing questions, and the actions of "quack doctors in white coats."

The opposition is primarily aimed at the practical feasibility of adopting a new international legal instrument (the optional protocol) and its subsequent implementation in Estonia. The criticism itself is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the dangers stemming from parental manipulation and the overall complexity of the legislation.

The main opponents are the ruling government coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of destroying Estonia through tax hikes and healthcare issues. The criticism is intense, ranging from political accusations (maintaining the current wartime course) to criminal framing (such as comparisons to the mafia). Specifically, Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna and Prime Minister Kristen Michal are being criticized.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government, particularly the Ministry of Climate, for allowing wind turbines to be constructed before clear safety standards regarding infrasound have been established. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of endangering public health and acting in reverse (building first, ensuring safety later). The minister is also criticized for evading the question.

The main opponents are coalition MPs, commission members (including doctors), and ministry representatives, who are accused of deliberate lying and favoring pedophiles. The criticism is intense and personal, calling into question the opponents' morality and conscience. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, they are demanding the rejection of the draft bill.