By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The main confrontation is directed at the minister and the government's policy, which is considered flawed and undemocratic. The criticism targets both the structure of the electoral college (which favors the coalition) and the data underpinning the energy sector decisions (outdated studies). The speaker issued a direct challenge to the minister, asking him to refute the WHO conclusions if he refuses to acknowledge them.

The main opponents are the ministries maintaining the drug monopoly and the proponents of the draft bill, especially Andre Hanimäe. The criticism is intense, focusing on political corruption and the disregard for the constitution. The speaker asks the minister directly whether he is prepared to finally break up the monopoly, and casts doubt on the legal expertise of the opponent (Hanimäe).

The main opponents are the chair of the session (for failing to apply procedural rules) and the government, particularly Minister Joller (for incompetence and presenting false data). The criticism is sharp and focuses both on procedural violations and political injustice concerning budget priorities. The speaker demands accountability and justification, ruling out any compromise regarding false data or unfair decisions.

The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is sharply criticized both for his policies (the car tax) and his personal background (a former communist). The intensity of the criticism is high, accusing the opposing side of working against the Estonian people, the highest authority, and of violating property rights.