By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The rhetorical style is direct, formal, and strongly adversarial, especially regarding the minister's responses. The speaker relies on logical and factual arguments (democratic representation, the age of the studies) and expresses their dissatisfaction with the answers openly and resolutely, stating: "I inform you that your answer is unsatisfactory."

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and confrontational, employing strong metaphors, such as comparing Andre Hanimäe's speech to the storming of the Winter Palace. The appeals are primarily logical, relying on the constitution and the opinions of top legal experts, but they also include emotional warnings about a "digital concentration camp."

The rhetorical style is demanding and critical, particularly towards the session's chairman, insisting on the stricter application of rules and demanding that order be maintained. On substantive matters, the style is confrontational and highlights moral injustice, employing strong logical contrast (large salary increases versus minimal support). The language used is formal, focusing on legislation and figures, and requires direct justification from the government.

The rhetorical style is highly combative and accusatory, employing strong emotional and historical parallels (communism, forced collectivization) to delegitimize the policy. The speaker launches sharp personal attacks, accusing the Minister of Finance of pursuing Soviet communist policies.