By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The main confrontation is aimed at the coalition and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who stand accused of obstructing the opposition's legislative work and abusing the rights of the Riigikogu. Strong criticism is also leveled against the Estonian Public Broadcasting (ERR), accusing them of political imbalance, serving the "deep state," and journalistic prejudgment of guilt before a court ruling.

The main confrontation is directed against the minister, who is accused of violating the law and outright lying when answering a question. The criticism is intense, focusing on both ethics and the breach of law (the Advertising Act). Compromise is ruled out, as accountability for the lie is demanded.

The main opponent is Minister Mart Võrklaev, who is facing intense personal criticism. The criticism focuses on his alleged dishonesty and lack of knowledge concerning climate targets, which calls into question his competence in managing the draft legislation. The speaker's goal is to completely undermine the opponent's credibility.

The main confrontation is aimed at Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev and the Reform Party-led government, criticizing their privatization plan. The criticism is intense, focusing on how detrimental the policy is to the Estonian people, and accusing the minister of dodging the issue.

The main confrontation is directed against the institution of the Prosecutor's Office, which is accused of systematic abuse of power, impunity, and internal protection. He criticizes the Ministry of Justice for its lack of oversight and points to the political utilization of the Prosecutor's Office (Porto Franco, Marti Kuusik), which led to the collapse of the government. He also clashes with colleagues who, according to him, label him similarly to those who carried out the deportations of people.

The main opponent is the government or the decision-making authority (the executive), which is sharply criticized for incompetent financial decisions and deceiving the electorate. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political dishonesty (breaking promises) and on the substance of the policy (decisions unpopular with taxpayers).