By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Total Sessions: 9

Fully Profiled: 9

2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views focus on tax policy, clearly supporting a reduction in the VAT rate for cancer medicines to improve access to healthcare. The sugar tax is mentioned in passing as a smaller issue compared to E-substances, indicating a preference for regulation over taxation.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data. Although the capacity for drone manufacturing is mentioned, it is treated primarily as a strategic and military matter, rather than an economic policy question.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
Data is scarce.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is scarce. The speaker uses the analogy of the private sector employer/employee relationship to criticize the prime minister's accountability, but economic policy positions (taxes, spending, regulation) are not presented.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views are cautious and emphasize the negative financial repercussions of an accelerated transition to renewable energy, remaining skeptical of the government's promises regarding cheaper energy. The speaker is concerned about the economic issues referenced by the head of the stock exchange, evidently preferring stability over a rapid, but risky transition.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economic views are linked to energy stability, emphasizing that renewable energy cannot meet demands during winter or for more complex tasks (e.g., welding), thereby forcing the use of fossil fuels. It prioritizes the reliability and practical feasibility of energy production in Nordic conditions.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Economic views are focusing on the rising cost of living and the resulting poverty, accusing the government of waging an economic war against the people. Emphasis is placed on the need to understand and improve the livelihood of the poor, contrasting sharply with the government’s narrative focused purely on percentages and figures.