By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Legislative focus is placed on the procedure for terminating an international treaty, with emphasis on the necessity of choosing between denunciation and suspension. The speaker acts as a critical evaluator of the draft bill, searching for the optimal legislative strategy.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The focus is on oversight and procedural justice, demanding an explanation from the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) as to why proceedings have not been initiated regarding a campaign that more flagrantly disturbs public order. Attention is also paid to ensuring the quality of the Riigikogu (Parliament) information hour and the impartiality of the session chair.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The legislative focus centers on opposition to government-implemented tax changes and regulatory activities that increase the administrative burden. The speaker positions themselves as a strong opponent of the existing legislative direction, concentrating on the negative consequences.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The focus is on questioning the government's action plan and decisions regarding the potential withdrawal of the Estonian Defence Forces from Iraq, rather than initiating or supporting specific legislative bills. The goal is to compel the executive branch to answer a critical foreign policy question.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The legislative focus is on the regulation of student loans and their impact on students' lives, with the speaker's role being to analyze the effectiveness of the current policy. Assessing the adequacy of the student loan amount is the priority.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The legislative focus is directed toward amendments to tax laws, particularly the raising of the Value Added Tax (VAT) for accommodation establishments. The speaker is acting as an opponent, demanding that the government justify the specific numerical choices made in these legal amendments.