By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The rhetorical style is largely critical, demanding, and concerned, particularly regarding immigration and integration policies, where the failure of existing measures is emphasized. Logical arguments, statistical data, and historical comparisons (e.g., the English Parliament) are employed to support their positions. Direct questions and rhetorical challenges are favored to energize the discussion and criticize the opponents' lack of understanding ("What would you call the politicians who fail to grasp this?").

The rhetorical style is analytical, critical, and data-driven, relying heavily on statistics and fine legal distinctions. The tone is formal yet confrontational, particularly when the speaker demands that the presiding officer correct the minister for the use of inaccurate data. Hypotheses are employed that are grounded in numerical data, thereby emphasizing the logical appeal.

The rhetorical style is formal and grounded in logic, utilizing statistical data (specifically, the sharp rise observed in 2022 and 2023) to support its claims. The tone is serious and investigative, posing a loaded question designed to help the minister uncover the actual underlying causes. Instead of relying on emotional appeal, the emphasis is placed on analyzing facts and causal relationships.

The style is analytical, structured, and consistent, repeatedly employing the model: draft provision, government reaction, speaker’s counter-reaction. The tone is critical of the government's inaction, particularly regarding the absence of the promised "comprehensive solution," which has been awaited for two years. Extensive use of quotes and data lends the presentation an academic and logical character, while the criticism directed at the government is intense and accusatory ("utterly pointless," "shameful").

The rhetorical style is urgent and cautionary, emphasizing that Estonia is "at a crossroads" due to mass immigration and that the situation is "disastrous." The speaker relies heavily on statistical data and facts to construct a logical appeal, but also employs a strong emotional framework, citing the failure of integration and the rise of social problems (e.g., criminogenic factors, HIV).