By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The main criticism is directed at the actions of the minister and the government concerning the decline in the quality of education and the disregard of procedural rules before parliament (the late submission of materials). The decision to vote down the draft bill is also criticized, especially since the underlying problem exists and could be rectified during the proceedings.

The key opponents are the government (the minister) and the bill's rapporteur, who are criticized for their ideological choices and irrational overregulation. The minister is questioned over the betrayal of his conservative values, while the rapporteur is branded as a representative of social democratic ideology.