By Months: Kristo Enn Vaga
Total Months: 8
Fully Profiled: 8
12.2024
8 Speeches
They are directly opposing "political opponents" who are spreading misinformation about the purpose of the security tax. The criticism is fact-based and intense, with the goal of refuting claims that the money is not being used to ensure security, and advising them "not to see a ghost where there is none."
11.2024
5 Speeches
The main adversary is Russia, which is described as an aggressor whose expansionist interests threaten the whole of Europe, thereby necessitating Europe to boost its defense readiness. China is criticized for non-competitive state intervention in the production of electric vehicles, which justifies the imposition of EU customs tariffs. Domestic opposition is not criticized in the speeches.
09.2024
9 Speeches
There is no direct political confrontation, but the speaker addresses questions and concerns raised by colleagues (e.g., Vladimir, Priit). He explains why late proposals from interest groups (e.g., the Family Doctors' Association) could not be included in the current draft bill, defending the committee's procedural decisions. He directs the more complex questions (e.g., the basis for background checks) to be discussed within the framework of the future Readiness Act.
06.2024
10 Speeches
Insufficient data is available. The speeches concentrate on presenting the draft bills and responding to questions from colleagues; there is no direct criticism or confrontation with political opponents.
05.2024
1 Speeches
There is no direct opposition, but the speaker makes an implicit reference to the need to address economic revitalization in addition to the current cuts and tax hikes. The criticism is aimed at a policy that focuses solely on cuts and tax increases, rather than on stimulating the economy.
04.2024
6 Speeches
Direct personal criticism was not offered, but mention was made of the obstructionist mass amendments proposed by the EKRE faction, which hindered the processing of the bills. Reference was also made to internal political opposition within the National Defence Committee, where the border guard bill failed to gain a supporting majority (4 in favor, 4 against).
02.2024
2 Speeches
It does not express direct opposition, but rather poses challenging questions to the Foreign Minister regarding the current policy (EU unanimity). It points to conflicting expert opinions circulating in the public domain in order to compel the government to justify its stance.
01.2024
1 Speeches
The remarks do not reveal any direct opposition or criticism toward any group. It is noted that no amendments to the draft bill were submitted by anyone outside the steering committee, which suggests widespread tacit support or minimal opposition.