Agenda Profile: Kristo Enn Vaga
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Extension of the Term for the Use of the Defence Forces in Fulfilling the International Obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the Post-Conflict Peacekeeping Operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria" (711 OE)
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political position is firmly geared toward supporting international peacekeeping missions, underscoring the exemplary quality of Estonia's contribution to the UNTSO operation. This stance is policy-driven, centering on the fulfillment of the nation's international commitments and the extension of the mandate for defense personnel until the end of 2026. The speaker stresses the significance of Estonia's role, pointing specifically to the appointment of the head of the Cairo liaison office next year.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the work of the National Defense Committee, the handling of draft legislation, and history (UNTSO began in 1948, with Estonia contributing since 1997). Technical terms are employed (linguistic clarifications, Head of the Cairo Liaison Office), and specific dates and procedural steps are referenced. Furthermore, the speaker is authoritative in explaining the origin of the mission’s official designation, referencing the United Nations Organization.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, focusing on conveying the progress of the Riigikogu proceedings and the decisions made by the committee. The tone is respectful and grateful ("I thank my very good colleagues"), particularly for the support given to the mission-related draft legislation. Logical argumentation and the presentation of facts are employed, while emotional appeals are avoided.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker’s pattern of activity is linked to managing the legislative process, specifically by presenting reports from the National Defence Committee sessions (October 20 and November 3). He/She serves as the rapporteur for the draft bill, indicating active participation in the committee’s work and the subsequent communication of its findings to the plenary assembly.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct confrontation. In response to the question (from Mr. Epler) regarding the mission's name, it is factually explained that the designation originates from the UN, not the Estonian government. The criticism is aimed more at correcting inaccurate perceptions than at a political adversary.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial. Repeated emphasis is placed on the unanimous decision of the National Defence Committee when approving the bill and concluding the second reading ("approved by consensus"). Gratitude is expressed to colleagues for their strong support for all mission bills.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly international, centering on the UN peacekeeping operation in the Middle East (Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Syria). Emphasis is placed on Estonia's contribution to international structures and the fulfillment of obligations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on extending the mandate for the use of the defense forces in a peacekeeping operation (Draft Bill 711 OE), with the entity acting as a strong supporter and conductor of the procedure. The objective was to conclude the bill's second reading and submit it for a final vote, noting that this is the final mission bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed