By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Uibo

The style is pragmatic and insistent, emphasizing the necessity of making a decision and avoiding further delay, since "we have already lost a decade due to indecision." The speaker employs simple, memorable metaphors (a broken alarm clock, the legs of a stool) to clarify complex issues. The emotional intensity of the debate is acknowledged, but the focus remains on being logical and fact-based.

The style is formal, direct, and extremely brief, focusing on the procedural request. The speaker quickly communicates the faction's need for an internal discussion, while emphasizing that this will involve minimal time expenditure ("one minute is sufficient").

The style is predominantly combative and laudatory, praising the minister for his competence and argumentation skills ("A sheer delight!"). Both emotional appeals (references to Estonia's sovereignty and the attacking of the free spirit) and logical appeals are used, listing specific reforms and achievements. The tone is reform-minded and optimistic, but sharp toward opponents.