Session Profile: Toomas Uibo
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-10-22
Political Position
The speaker’s political position is strongly oriented toward improving the business environment, emphasizing the need to reduce bureaucracy and regulations. He opposes the Ministry of Finance’s proposed 25% increase in the mandatory audit thresholds, arguing that this figure does not correlate with Estonia’s 57% inflation rate, and instead supports the minimum 50% increase demanded by entrepreneurs. This position is clearly policy-based and focused on enhancing economic competitiveness.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of financial regulations and economic statistics, particularly concerning auditing thresholds and the impact of inflation. He uses technical terms (net sales, turnover, assets) and presents specific data, such as the increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Eurozone (27.2%) and Estonia (57%). He also shows knowledge of methodology, criticizing the inclusion of companies with zero turnover when calculating the percentage of audit obligation coverage (5.5%).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is concerned and urgent, emphasizing that this is a critical moment for giving the economy oxygen. The speaker relies heavily on logical and data-driven arguments, utilizing statistics to demonstrate why the proposed bill is unfair to Estonian businesses. The style is formal and focuses on detailed policy analysis rather than emotional appeals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Finance, which proposed an inadequate 25% rise in thresholds, thereby increasing the administrative burden on Estonian businesses. The criticism is both policy-based and methodological, specifically challenging the ministry's calculations concerning the number of companies subject to mandatory auditing. Furthermore, the figures presented by Jaak Aab, Chairman of the Economic Affairs Committee, regarding turnover growth are also being criticized.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is acting on behalf of the Eesti 200 faction and expresses the desire to reach an agreement in the chamber or the committee in order to accommodate entrepreneurs. This demonstrates openness to compromise between the two readings to achieve a better outcome (an increase in thresholds of at least 50%).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly at the national level, zeroing in on the competitiveness and administrative burden faced by Estonian businesses. The analysis employs international comparison (the Eurozone average inflation rate) to highlight Estonia's unique circumstances and the necessity of finding domestic solutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker is a strong proponent of the market economy and entrepreneurship, calling for a reduction in bureaucracy and regulations. He supports raising various thresholds, which would ease the administrative burden on roughly a thousand companies and provide a much-needed boost to the economy. The preference is for solutions that do not create financial liabilities for the state but instead improve the overall business environment.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on the draft bill concerning the raising of mandatory audit thresholds. The speaker opposes the solution proposed in the bill (a 25% increase) and is initiating amendments to achieve the 50% increase supported by businesses.
2 Speeches Analyzed