By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The main confrontation is directed at the presenter, who is criticized both for opposing the referendum and for ignoring the burden of consumer subsidization. The criticism is intense and is expressed through direct accusations of disregarding the public and showing a lack of concern for them.

The primary adversary is the government, which faces criticism for cutting social spending and pursuing an ill-conceived green transition. The criticism is policy-driven, further accusing the government of creating avenues for corruption related to the allocation of 3 billion euros to unknown organizations. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding the rejection of the proposed bills.

The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for the decline of agriculture and inadequate support. The criticism is policy-driven and results-oriented, accusing the state of failing to guarantee stable conditions for local producers. They are demanding an immediate and concrete strategic shift that rules out the continuation of the current policy.