Agenda Profile: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to amending the constitution regarding the revocation of non-citizens' voting rights in local elections. The speaker stresses that this constitutes an undemocratic collective punishment, which violates the principles of the constitution. The position is value-driven and focuses on protecting national security, arguing that revoking the right to vote would actually undermine it.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in constitutional law, citing the conflict between collective punishment and the principles of democracy and the constitution. Furthermore, specific statistical data (80,000 Russian citizens versus fewer than 2,000 who voted for Putin) are employed to rebut the opposing side's security arguments. Inquiries are also raised concerning the execution of risk analyses (covering security, political, and international risks).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and penetrating, emphasizing that the events unfolding do not constitute "normal lawmaking." It employs both logical arguments (statistics, constitutional violations) and emotional appeals, accusing opponents of dividing and destroying the state for the sake of political and financial interests. The speech maintains a formal tone but includes strong judgments ("insane green policy," "unlawfulness").
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data is limited to three speeches given on a single day (2025-03-26) in the Riigikogu during the third reading of the Act on the Amendment of the Constitution. The pattern of activity is linked to opposing a specific bill in the Riigikogu chamber.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposing side is criticizing their "colleagues," who they accuse of serving political and financial interests while amending the constitution, specifically with the aim of stripping a particular party of electoral support. The criticism is intense and addresses both procedural violations and the opponents' motives, accusing them of dividing society and undermining national security.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
No data available.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is at the national level (amendment of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia and state security) and the international level (analysis of international risk). Specific regional or local topics are absent, even though the right to vote in local elections is central to the discussion.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views are expressed through criticism of government spending, specifically opposition to "madcap green policies" and "questionable schemes." It is emphasized that disenfranchisement removes people's right to participate in the distribution of the taxes they have paid and to fund political sponsors.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is defending the voting rights of permanent residents (including holders of the gray passport and Russian citizens) in local elections. Strong emphasis is placed on civil liberties, the principles of the rule of law, and protecting loyal taxpayers from collective punishment.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on opposing Draft Act 536 SE, which proposes amendments to the constitution regarding the restriction of suffrage. The speaker is a staunch opponent, challenging the bill's legitimacy and highlighting its potential negative impact on national security.
3 Speeches Analyzed