By Months: Vilja Toomast
Total Months: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
06.2025
1 Speeches
There is no opposition; the speaker emphasizes that no amendments were submitted to the draft bill, which indicates a lack of opposition at this stage of the proceedings. There is no criticism regarding policy, procedure, or individuals.
05.2025
1 Speeches
No data available.
11.2024
1 Speeches
The opposition is aimed at the bill initiated by Kalle Grünthal, the rejection of which the committee unanimously supported. The criticism is policy-driven, emphasizing that repealing the law is neither justified nor sensible given the current security situation.
06.2024
10 Speeches
The main opposition is directed at the Centre Party faction, which submitted four amendments against doubling the fine rates (e.g., fare evasion, parking fines). The criticism is political, emphasizing that the Centre Party does not agree with the rate increases planned by the government. The speaker also rejected the proposal from the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which did not consider raising the fine unit to be reasonable.
04.2024
2 Speeches
He identifies those commission members (Kingo, Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Vooglaid) who voted against concluding the first reading of the bill as the opposing party. The criticism he cites primarily focused on the lack of impact assessments, the effectiveness of fines for repeat offenders, and doubts about using the fines to bolster the state budget.
02.2024
1 Speeches
No direct confrontation was expressed, but it was reported that Riina Solman’s amendments were rejected by the Legal Affairs Committee. The criticism was policy-based, stemming from the Ministry of Justice’s concerns regarding security (criminal individuals) and the readiness of prisons to offer higher education.
01.2024
1 Speeches
Insufficient data.